The Argument Protocol in action!

At TC’s Summer Institute a few years ago, Mary Ehrenworth introduced our session to the Argument Protocol: a highly engaging and interactive way in which to gather evidence and formulate strong, well-reasoned claims, which could then lead to compelling persuasive writing.  Ever since, the Argument Protocol has been one of the most looked forward to aspects of my sixth grade writing workshop.  The moment I begin describing it to my students, I can see their eyes sparkle with anticipation: we get to face off and debate? we get to caucus (they love that serious-sounding word!)? we get to present our case like a real lawyer? Great – can we start now?

If you haven’t worked with this protocol yet, the last few weeks of school when your kids are restless for something new is the perfect time to give this a try.  Here’s what it has looked like over the course of two in Room 202:

Walking through the protocol:

I borrowed this directly from Mary, with a few tweaks of my own over the years:

Screen Shot 2015-05-15 at 10.18.05 PM

We take our time with this, and my kids have the opportunity to ask lots of questions.  It’s also important for them to see exactly why each step is necessary for building a strong case, and for them to understand their role in the process.

Choosing the topic:

I pick something new each year, and stay away from the type of persuasive writing topics that my kids have been over exposed to in their years of test prep: uniforms, longer school years, etc. This year I picked a topic I had been interested in myself: New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio’s bid to ban horse-drawn carriages in the city. I have also found that any topic having to do with animals is instantly engaging to kids – they feel invested in the topic, and that it has an authentic importance.

Presenting the evidence:

I limit the number of articles and sources I present my students, it becomes confusing to sort through too many articles and notes.  After all, the point of this whole exercise is to learn the process and language of convincing argument and then to translate that into writing, not collect evidence for a research paper.

Students do not know yet which side they will be assigned to debate, so they must listen carefully to all information presented. We turn and talk after each source is presented, so that they can clarify or add to their notes.

IMG_1305

Careful note taking for both sides of the argument.

 

This year, we watched a video presenting the issue:

http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/segment/the-great-carriage-horse-debate/52e7c93ffe34443a53000001

Another in favor of the carriages:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnNgAKQEN7U

And an article against the carriages:

http://www.nyclass.org/horse_drawn_carriages

Assigning the stance:

The easiest way is by counting the class and having odd numbers take one side and even numbers take another.  Since classroom numbers are rarely even (this is a conspiracy against teachers – I am convinced of this!), you will have to be part of the mix. But that just adds to the fun.

Caucusing:

This is where it starts to get loud and messy – the more enthusiastic the students are, the noisier it gets. Students meet on either side of the classroom and present their strongest points, and the job of their teams is to weigh those points and determine if they are worthy enough, fact based enough, and clearly stated through the language of argument.  A handout with persuasive words and phrases, or an anchor chart to refer to can be very helpful.

IMG_1301

Highlighting the strongest arguments on both sides helps students hone their arguments and sort through their evidence.

 

You will need to facilitate these discussions to keep them from disintegrating into shouting matches (these are kids after all, and they will get carried away!).  They will need no more than ten minutes for this – a limit on time keeps them focused and lends an urgency to staying on topic.  The last three minutes are to write down their stance and two compelling reasons in their writer’s notebooks.  I make sure my students do this, so that they don’t forget what they were going to say (a lesson we learned the hard way).

IMG_1276      

Face Off!

The two groups form lines facing each other, partners  fan out across the room and present their points. They write down the opposing points of view (so that they can formulate counterclaims), and then they each get a chance to compliment their partner: this was your strongest point, and here’s why I thought so. Each side gets two minutes to present, another minute or so to compliment.

IMG_1278

Back to the group to caucus:

Students share the counterclaims they have gathered and discuss how to best rebut: what evidence can they present? what factual or logical error can they take advantage of?  I limit this to about ten minutes, with the last few set aside to write down what they will say.

Face Off!

Partners meet again to listen to the counterclaims and take notes.  At this point, I loosen the rules and let my kids talk the issue  out a bit more.  About halfway through, I let them know that they will be choosing the stance they want – the side they wish to argue in their letter to the Mayor.  Now that they’ve gathered evidence from both sides of the issue, and heard opposing points of view, they tend to be even more sure of the stance they want to take, and love the idea of choice.

Flash draft:

Here’s where I walk my students through a mini lesson to remind them of the framework of their draft:

IMG_1299

and then they begin drafting:

IMG_1303

We will confer through the drafting process next week, then move to Google Docs for the final revision/editing process. Once we are ready, each student will address their own envelopes and we will take a field trip to the nearest mailbox to personally mail our letters to Mayor de Blasio.  We hope to get a response or two…🙂

Here were some of the take away thoughts my kids shared about the process:

  • It really helped to talk out my reasons and hear reactions – it helped me focus more
  • I liked the way we helped each other build our argument – it was nice to have a team
  • Talking through actually changed my mind about my reasons, which were kinda weak at first
  • It really helped to take notes for the counterclaim – R. came up with reasons I hadn’t even thought of, which helped me make my point better
  • I think knowing both sides before choosing a side worked better for me – I had to really listen to both sides, not jump in with how I felt at first
  • Talking with the argument language was hard at first, but now I see that it is helping me draft better
  • It was so fun!

Have you tried the Argument Protocol in your classrooms? What tips or ideas could you suggest to make this process better?  Leave a comment and let us know!