On Monday we discussed endings to editorials in my ninth grade class. This is how the teaching went:
- Me: I’ve noticed many of you are ready to write an ending, but aren’t sure how to go about it. So let’s talk about it. Will you pull out the mentor texts we’ve been studying and reread each of the endings?
- Everyone finds their texts. This is possible, because they each have binders with a “Text Section,” and I post the mentor texts on our Moodle site for those who forgot/lost/ate their binders. They read.
- As they start chatting because they’re finished reading, I say: Will you talk with a partner about what you are noticing about the ending. How are the editorialists crafting their endings? What is important about the endings? What can you do in your own editorial?
- They talk.
- Then we begin collecting their ideas:
It feels over, like you know it’s finished.
It makes you want to go do something.
It makes you go, hmmmm.
Hey, he started his last sentence with ‘And.’
This one started with ‘But.”
Here’s one starting with an ‘Or.’
The endings are short. Pitts wrote just one sentence and made it into a single paragraph. Can one sentence be a paragraph?
This one is only two sentences. Man, they really make me what to do something, though.
- The things they noticed opened the doors for teaching how to write a powerful ending:
Make your stance clear at the end.
Call the reader to action.
Up the emotional appeal — really hook ’em.
Break conventions to get the reader’s attention. Starting the last sentence with a conjunction is very common in editorials. Why do you think editorialsts do this?
Yes, one sentence can be a single paragraph. What is the effect it has? Why did the writer do it?
The lesson ended with a quick write session, where students used their writer’s notebook to play with an ending for their editorial. First they reread their editorials (whatever they have so far) then they had-a-go at an ending. Five minutes later they were making their own choices as writers (some continued to draft their ending, others worked in another capacity) and I conferred.
Later that day I was in a second grade writing workshop. They were working on writing endings for their narratives. This is what struck me:
They were looking at endings and talking about the things they noticed the writers doing to end their stories. The process these eight year olds were engaged in was exactly the same as the process the fifteen year olds used that morning.
This is why Writing Workshop is powerful. Good teaching is good teaching . . . no matter the age of the students. Looking at mentor texts and asking: “How did the writer make this?” is a powerful teaching strategy. We know our instruction is sound when the technique can cross grade levels because our focus is on teaching writers, not teaching writing.
Discover more from TWO WRITING TEACHERS
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


I absolutely agree with you! Good teaching is good teaching regardless the age of the students!
I learned the most about teaching from my early childhood courses! Same strategies apply, just the level of difficulty changed.
Also… I’m a huge fan of Writer’s Workshop!
*Great post 🙂
LikeLike
I really enjoyed reading this post. The title caught my attention in Google Reader because yesterday, in my college writing class (sophomores), we talked about the ending of a mentor text: the introduction section to a scientific research paper. Students made observations about what that paragraph does for the intro section. It was very powerful.
I agree that good teaching is good teaching and that techniques can work across age groups. In fact, a few things I do with my college-age students I have learned from my own children, who came home from elementary school and told me about some of the neat things their teachers did with them, and then I figured out how to translate it relevantly for an older group. For example, when my daughter Grace was about 7, she and I were playing school. During our pretend writing workshop, she was writing and I was… reading. Waiting it out. She looked up at me: “What are you doing?” I answered. She retorted, “You’re supposed to float!” What? “You walk around and touch base with the kids. Talk to them about their writing. Ask questions. Give suggestions.” Wow, she was right! Just because college students might not need supervision while doing in-class writing, they do benefit from a “floating” teacher, who touches base with them and talks writer-to-writer.
I get good ideas and affirmation from your blog. Thanks for your work!
LikeLike