Skip to content

Reading First Was Deemed “Ineffective”

The NY Times published an article entitled, “An Initiative on Reading Is Rated Ineffective” today. Not exactly a shocker most of us literacy educators, but perhaps shocking to others who haven’t followed this part of the NCLB Legislation that closely.

I know this blog is about writing, but I felt I’d be remiss if I didn’t post a link to this article. This piece begs the question: WHAT’S NEXT?

Want to read some other interesting education-related articles? If so, just click on the links I created below:

  • Beef recall spotlights real cost of cheap school lunches
  • Columnist Julia Steiny looks at Minnesota’s plan to save money and improve schools
  • School Campus Receives a Living Senator’s Name, Much to His Opponent’s Annoyance
  • In 123-page guide, state offers schools tips on stopping bullies
  • Kids working for peace
  • Shakira becomes an education advocate
  • Stacey Shubitz View All

    Literacy Consultant. Author. Former 4th and 5th Grade Classroom Teacher.

    One thought on “Reading First Was Deemed “Ineffective” Leave a comment

    1. I was actually happy to hear this. Obviously NCLB doesn’t apply to my students (although, of course, it does apply and is part of the reason some of them dropped — or were pushed — out of school), I’ve looked at this initiative and had my doubts.

      If you, Ruth, Jen, Kevin and the other excellent instructors whose work I’ve been following out here in cyberspace were to develop a curriculum … we might actually see some real results!


    %d bloggers like this: